Rubber Meets Road / Lighting: Design Deep Dive

What Well-Lit Streets Should Feel Like

Safe and vibrant streets require welcoming lights, not overwhelming brightness. An expert team of lighting designers and urban planners assessed lighting conditions in three New York City neighborhoods — selected by cross-referencing six years of gun violence data with a network of community-based partners — and identified scalable solutions that can be deployed quickly and effectively.

Scroll

Better light, not brighter light

While research shows that brighter lights can reduce crime, harsh lighting can have a negative impact on how welcoming a space looks and feels. The quality of the light impacts whether people want to be on the street socializing and shopping, or feel unwelcome and prefer to stay away.

01
Quality over intensity
Excessively bright lights create glare, visual discomfort and deep shadows. Evenly distributed light with controlled glare improves visibility far more effectively than raw intensity.
02
Activity deters crime
Well-designed lighting encourages public activity, supports local businesses and fosters ownership over public spaces — creating a virtuous cycle in which having more people on the street further deters crime.
03
Temporary to permanent
Novel mobile-to-permanent fixtures offer a new strategy: rapid deployment for immediate impact, then conversion to long-term infrastructure for lasting change.

Nighttime illumination: key concepts

Understanding four core lighting properties is essential to designing safer streets.

Illuminance

Illuminance measures how much light falls on a surface or location and is expressed in foot-candles (a measure of the light cast by a single candle upon a surface one foot away). It is the primary metric for evaluating the amount of light in a given space.

Why It Matters

Illuminance is affected by the frequency of light fixtures and their output level. Too much creates glare and health risks; too little leaves people unable to see clearly.

FOOT-CANDLES (fc) 2 Recommended Outdoor 491 Current Mobile Units 250x

Contrast and uniformity

Contrast is the difference in illuminance between two adjacent locations, expressed as a ratio. High contrast means bright spots next to dark ones.

Why It Matters

When contrast is high, the human eye struggles to adapt. When light is uniform, the ratio between a brighter location and an adjacent darker location is 4:1 or less. Uniform light dramatically improves visibility and comfort, which research associates with greater perceived safety.

AVG:MIN RATIO 4:1 Target 34:1 Current mobile units 8x higher than recommended

Glare

Glare is the sensation caused by an excessively bright light source in the field of vision — similar to oncoming headlights that make it harder to see the road ahead.

Why It Matters

Overly bright streetlights cause discomfort and decrease visibility. When lights produce glare, contrast increases, making dark areas seem even darker and reducing pedestrians’ ability to see and feel safe.

Unshielded
Glare from unshielded streetlight, pedestrian not visible
Shielded
Glare blocked, pedestrian now visible
124th St. and 89th Ave., Richmond Hill, Queens. Blocking the bright light source reveals a pedestrian previously invisible due to glare.

Color temperature

Color temperature describes how warm or cool a light source appears, measured in Kelvins. Candlelight is warm and amber; daylight is cool and blue.

Why It Matters

Warmer sources (3,000 K or below) create a more comfortable exterior environment. They encourage people to use public spaces and thus improve both perceived and actual safety.

2,000 K 3,000 K 6,500 K Warm / amber Cool / blue Target: ≤ 3,000 K

Spacing matters more than power

The human eye sees best when light is uniformly distributed. Several lower-output fixtures improve visibility more than one high-powered fixture. The two examples below have the same average illuminance — but vastly different results.

100% output, fewer fixtures

Few bright fixtures with dark gaps between pools of light
Average3.2 fc
Minimum0.1 fc
Avg/min ratio32:1
High-output fixtures spaced far apart create deep shadows. The 32:1 ratio is 8x higher than the recommended 4:1 target.

50% output, double the fixtures

More moderate fixtures with uniform light distribution
Average3.2 fc
Minimum1.0 fc
Avg/min ratio3.2:1
Half the output, double the fixtures. The 3.2:1 ratio meets the 4:1 target, dramatically improving visibility and facial recognition.
Annotated view: fewer bright fixtures show people barely visible in dark gaps Annotated view: more moderate fixtures show people clearly visible throughout
The same average illuminance (3.2 fc) produces dramatically different visibility. With more frequent, lower-output fixtures (bottom), pedestrians are clearly visible across the entire space.

What came before and why it needs to change

In a landmark 2016 randomized controlled trial at New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) developments, the city tested the deployment of diesel-powered mobile towers — each fitted with four high-powered floodlights on a telescoping pole. The study found that these lights reduced crime — but at significant cost to light quality, health and livability.

36%
Crime reduction
~600K
Lumens per unit
491 fc
Illuminance below unit
34:1
Avg/min ratio
44 fc
Avg illuminance (Jacob Riis)
1.3 fc
Min illuminance (Jacob Riis)
~200 ft
Spacing between units

Strengths

  • Instant, targeted response to safety concerns
  • Flexible; no permanent infrastructure required

Shortcomings

  • Illuminance 250 times higher than recommended outdoor levels
  • Blinding glare that decreases nighttime visibility
  • Contrast ratio 8 times higher than recommended (34:1 vs. 4:1)
  • Unshielded light spills into apartments
  • Diesel engines produce noise and reduce air quality
  • Overly bright light disrupts circadian rhythms, which is linked with impaired daytime functioning, obesity and increased risk of breast cancer
  • Significant labor and operational costs to maintain
NYPD mobile lighting unit — diesel generator with telescoping pole
Standard NYPD mobile lighting unit used in the 2016 randomized controlled trial.
Photometric analysis showing extreme light distribution from mobile units at Jacob Riis Houses
Photometric analysis of mobile lighting units installed at NYCHA's Jacob Riis Houses (2017). Note extreme brightness directly below with rapid falloff.

What the streets told us

The design team partnered with local organizations to conduct after-dark walkthroughs covering commercial corridors, residential streets, parks and plazas in three neighborhoods — Brownsville, Brooklyn; Longwood, the Bronx; and Richmond Hill, Queens.

Food vendors on Watkins Ave plaza, Brownsville
Watkins Ave. plaza, Brownsville — vendor illumination activates public space at night
Poorly lit basketball court at NYCHA Seth Low
NYCHA Seth Low Senior Center — a basketball court with inadequate lighting
Bill Rainey Park in Longwood, Bronx at night
Bill Rainey Park, Longwood, the Bronx — existing lighting creates harsh shadows

What's working

Structure-mounted lighting

Lighting attached to structures and directed downward minimizes glare and contrast. It provides uniform illumination that promotes visibility and feelings of safety.

Lit storefronts

Businesses that added exterior lighting with semitransparent roll-down grates improved brightness and perceptions of safety even when stores were closed. When stores close and opaque grates come down, sidewalk illumination drops notably — highlighting the value of transparent alternatives.

Vendors on public plazas

Food vendors with focused illumination make plazas feel bright and active at night, creating comfortable gathering spaces and increasing “eyes on the street.”

Informal innovation

Residents brought battery-powered lighting to an unlit sports court for a game of cricket — a demonstration of the benefits of focused, activity-driven illumination that is only on when the activity is ongoing.

What can be improved

Poorly lit outdoor spaces

Poor lighting around covered structures, seating and courts creates shadow pockets that lower perceived safety and reduce use at night. The same is true of most scaffolding. Additional illumination would both reduce shadows and promote activity in the evening.

Overly bright building entries

Most entries rely on glare-heavy “wall pack” fixtures that blind pedestrians, making it harder to see text, doorways and other people. Shielded, downward-directed fixtures would help.

Light trespass

Light spilling beyond property lines reduces uniformity and increases contrast. In Richmond Hill, a tall Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) mast for the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) train yard illuminates an adjacent residential building, preventing occupants from achieving the darkness needed for healthy sleep. This could be corrected with proper shielding.

Overly bright sidewalks

Many locations have far more illumination than needed, worsened by the transition from legacy incandescent and metal halide fixtures to LEDs. Excessive light causes visual discomfort and deep shadows between buildings.

Nighttime walkthroughs coordinated by Pitkin Ave BID, Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice, and Chhaya CDC.

A family of improved lighting interventions

The proposed interventions are flexible, low-cost and apply best practices in lighting design. They can attach to existing infrastructure or stand independently. Different scales adapt to different urban conditions.

Wall-mounted

Mitigates glare while providing ample light at building entries and on adjacent sidewalks. Replaces existing wall-mounted fixtures on residential and commercial buildings.

Existing Infrastructure

Pedestrian arm on street pole

Attaches to existing octagonal street poles. Focuses light at human scale to provide supplemental illumination at corners, bus stops and areas of interest. Mounted no higher than the second-floor windowsill to prevent light spilling into residential units.

Existing Infrastructure

Mobile unit

A direct replacement for the 2016 trial units. Towed or flatbed-delivered, configurable with area or accent lights. Designed for near-immediate deployment in response to crime or events.

New Infrastructure

Permanent installation

The same mobile fixture adapted for permanent use. Installed on a concrete base and fed with appropriate electricity. No functional difference; just lasting infrastructure.

New Infrastructure

Lower-scale typology

For contexts where a standard 25-foot pole is too tall. Same fixtures at reduced height, proportionate to surrounding context. Used when only small areas need illumination.

New Infrastructure
Architectural drawings showing the family of proposed lighting interventions at different scales
Side views of the proposed fixture family: wall-mounted, pedestrian arm on existing street pole, mobile unit, permanent installation and lower typology, with human figures for scale.

Three layers of light

Mobile units can combine three types of lighting, each intended for a different urban condition. All use a color temperature of 3,000 K or warmer.

Ambient

Uniform, low-level illumination with glare control. Promotes pedestrian comfort and minimizes light spill onto buildings.

20–25 ft. above grade

Task/directed

Focused illumination for gathering areas or active zones. Light is directed at human scale.

12–18 ft. above grade

Glowing

Hyper-human-scale lighting to encourage gathering. Creates warm, inviting pools of light at ground level.

Ground to 6 ft.
Diagram showing three layers of light: ambient, task/directed and glowing on a single pole
A single mobile unit combines all three lighting types. Ambient light at 20–25 ft. provides overall illumination, task light at 12–18 ft. focuses on gathering areas and glowing elements at ground level encourage activity. All lighting is 3,000 K or warmer.
Technical drawing of the improved light source showing glare shields, tilt control, beam angle options and reflector
The improved light source features built-in shields, reflectors and various beam-spread optics. Limiting tilt to a maximum of 30 degrees eliminates most instances of glare.

Glare shield options

Glare shield accessories prevent light from blinding residents and pedestrians, improving both visual comfort and visibility. The task light's built-in shield and reflector, limited to a maximum 30-degree tilt, eliminates most glare while allowing flexibility to direct light exactly where it is needed.

FRONT

Front shield

Limits glare in the head-on direction. Creates a comfortable environment or keeps light focused around the post.

SIDE

Side shield

Limits light spill on either side. Prevents light trespass on buildings or adjacent properties.

HOUSE

House-side shield

Limits light spill behind the source. Prevents light trespass on buildings directly behind the pole.

Nonlighted accessories

The family of improved lights can incorporate a variety of accessories that add resources for residents and passersby. (Devices shown are manufactured by Lumca and are included as reference images, not necessarily for specification.)

Occupancy sensor device

Occupancy sensor

Detects pedestrian movement to raise light levels when the area is occupied. Dims during unoccupied times to save energy.

USB device charging station

Device charging

Offers USB connections for device charging for pedestrians or plaza occupants.

Lockable power receptacle

Lockable receptacle

Provides local vendors an opportunity to activate exterior space through standard, lockable power receptacle.

Emergency call button

Emergency call button

Allows pedestrians to communicate directly with police, fire or EMS services.

Infinitely configurable

The proposed lights and accessories are infinitely configurable. Temporary installations use field-adjustable glare shields; site-specific considerations should inform the exact settings and accessories. Parts from temporary poles can be reused in permanent solutions.

Side view showing temporary-to-permanent conversion path for lighting units
Temporary installations use field-adjustable glare shields; settings inform the order of permanent, site-specific shields. After evaluation, the same unit transitions to permanent installation with a concrete foundation, permanent power and site-specific glare shields.

From identification to permanence

A community engagement and installation process ensures interventions meet neighborhood needs and are sited where they will be most effective.

1
Identify
Identify a site in need of additional or improved illumination. Convene stakeholders including community-based organizations (CBOs), business improvement districts (BIDs) or resident leaders; agencies with jurisdiction (DOT, NYCHA, Parks); NYPD; and architecture, urban design and lighting design professionals.
2
Plan
Engage stakeholders to understand local needs and constraints. Measure current conditions with light meters to establish a baseline. Identify possible design interventions through a design charrette and stress-test plans with community partners.
3
Implement
Design and install mobile lighting units for a fixed period, with consideration for how temporary installations can transition to permanence. Provide for regular maintenance checks as needed.
4
Survey
Assess efficacy through safety data, perception surveys, community feedback, and observations of use and externalities. Determine whether to add features such as emergency call buttons, occupancy sensors or charging stations based on community need.
5
Make permanent
If effective, convert the mobile unit to a permanent installation on a concrete base with permanent power.

The toolkit in action

Two sites identified during neighborhood walkthroughs show how the proposed lighting family could transform public space.

Site 1

Belmont Avenue Plaza, Brownsville, Brooklyn

This public plaza, once a dead-end street, has existing street lighting that provides base illumination. The proposal adds mobile units and task lighting in select locations to improve visibility, uniformity and user comfort. Pedestrian arms on existing street poles boost illumination around the perimeter. A temporary lighting tower with ambient light covers the intersection between the adjacent NYCHA campus and the plaza, while focused task lights serve seating and vendor areas. Power access for food vendors is recommended to further activate the space.

Top view and side view plan of Belmont Avenue Plaza lighting proposal
Mobile unit
Task light
Ambient light
Site 2

Playground and basketball court at NYCHA Seth Low Senior Center, Brownsville, Brooklyn

This site at the corner of a NYCHA housing development has little to no existing lighting infrastructure. A variety of mobile lighting units serve pedestrians, the play structure and the basketball court. Existing canopy lights can be retrofitted with wall-mounted fixtures or replaced entirely with wall arm lights to mitigate glare. Temporary lighting towers with ambient light serve pathways, while task light serves the sports court, fitted with a timer to shut off after 60 minutes of inactivity.

Top view and side view plan of NYCHA Seth Low playground and basketball court lighting proposal
Mobile unit
Task light
Ambient light

What policymakers should do

1

Adopt a "better light, not brighter light" policy

Focus on glare-free, evenly distributed, pedestrian-scale lighting rather than floodlights or over-illuminated spaces.

2

Prioritize lighting where people need it most

Direct efforts toward parks, sidewalks, plazas and other spaces where lighting makes the biggest difference in public safety.

3

Deploy adaptable strategies in high-need areas

Use newly proposed temporary mobile lighting for immediate impact and convert successful applications into permanent installations over time.

4

Leverage smart technology

Adopt motion sensors and dimmable LED fixtures to enhance safety while lowering costs and reducing light pollution.

5

Prioritize equity

Deploy warm, uniform, pedestrian-focused lighting to promote active use of public space in all neighborhoods.

Project team

Buro Happold

John Sloane, Maya Hladisova, Gabe Guilliams

Studio Gang

Abraham Bendheim, Wes Walker, Gia Biagi

Urban Design Forum

Daniel McPhee, Katherine Sacco

Community partners

Pitkin Ave BID

Tiera Mack

Youth Ministries for Peace and Justice

Reece Brosco

Chhaya CDC

Jessica Balgobin


Supporting research and references

Fotios, S., L. Unwin and M. Farrall. “Evaluation of Pedestrian Reassurance Gained by Higher Illuminances in Residential Streets Using the Day-Dark Approach.” Lighting Research & Technology 51, no. 4 (2018): 557–575.
James, Peter, et al. “Outdoor Light at Night and Breast Cancer Incidence in the Nurses’ Health Study II.” Environmental Health Perspectives 125, no. 8 (2017).
Mitre-Becerril, David, Amanda Agan and Stefano DellaVigna. “Can Deterrence Persist? Long-Term Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Street Lighting.” Criminology & Public Policy 21, no. 4 (2022): 865–891.
Motta, Michael. “American Medical Association Statement on Street Lighting.” JAAVSO 46, no. 2 (2018): 193–199.
Steinbach, Rebecca, et al. “The Effect of Reduced Street Lighting on Road Casualties and Crime in England and Wales.” J. Epidemiology and Community Health 69, no. 11 (2015): 1118–1124.